What is the Nikon 18-105mm lens used for?

The compact, versatile AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR is ideal for a broad range of shooting situations, from interiors and landscapes to beautiful portraits and intense action photography and videography.

Is 18-105mm a good lens?

The 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 provides very sharp results, at least as good as its recent contemporaries and better than previous designs in the same focal length range. Perhaps the best word to describe the sharpness profile of the 18-105mm is ‘consistent’.

When would you use a Nikon 70-300mm lens?

A 70-300 mm lens is a medium telephoto lens often employed for taking photos of wildlife, sporting events, and astronomical subjects such as the moon, planets, and stars. It is also recommended for travel photography, street photography, and other candid occasions.

What is the difference between a 105 and an 18-140?

Both were sharp but the 18-140 was sharper at 105 than the 18-105 was.    And, incredibly, the 18-140 was very sharp at 140. As far as “extra reach” I found the difference between 105 and 140 to be almost nothing.   The heavy lifting is done from 18 to 105. And the 18-140 didn’t weigh any more than the 105.

What do you use your 18-105 lens for?

Shooting mostly with D7500. I have the 18-105 and I find it a convenient walk around lens. I use the 18-105 for junior soccer shots (generally good light). That bit of extra reach on the 18-140 is alluring but if the performance is not really very different From what I have read online:

Why can’t we find a consensus on the 18-140?

In reply to threw the lens• May 20, 2019 threw the lens wrote: You are unlikely to find a consensus because few had both at the same time. There could be a kind of confirmation bias feeding into their impressions to justify the extra money they’d spent on the 18-140.